![installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008](https://content.spiceworksstatic.com/service.community/p/how_to_step_attachments/0000122092/59e4e22c/attached_file/ab12_agent_install_consoleview_orig.png)
- #Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 pro#
- #Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 software#
- #Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 Pc#
- #Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 plus#
See this section for a description of the procedure:
#Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 software#
Additionally, it could be mentioned that this software is useful to clone hard disks if you are upgrading your primay drive - this is how it has been recommended to me. Why does it matter if it is a "non-notable piece of software"? I find it quite useful to check up on products here on wikipedia, and if it really is a non notable piece of kit then it's nice to be able to find out.
#Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 plus#
True Image 10 offers extensive options plus the ability to image your entire PC, and this powerful combination puts it head and shoulders above the competition." Lovingboth 09:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC) there's just nothing else that comes close to matching it for power, speed and its do-it-all nature.
#Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 Pc#
Alas, backup remains a little too unfashionable for it to walk away with the prize, but if every PC had a copy of Acronis True Image 10 installed, the vital process would surely become second nature to all.
#Installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 pro#
it's so popular here that we nominated it in the Software of the Year category at last month's PC Pro Awards. Aude ( talk) 20:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC) PC Pro (a major UK PC magazine aimed at the professional rather than home market) has had it in its 'A List' (the 'best' available in a number of categories) for a long time.
![installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008](https://kb.acronis.com/system/files/content/2005/12/1515/001superfloppy.png)
It's a product carried by major retailers such as J&R Music and Computer World, CompUSA in their brick & mortar stores, and has been reviewed by CNET, PCWorld, etc. An editor has expressed the opinion it looks like a commercial.Ĭould someone provide cites to support the case that this article is notable in software terms, in order to prevent its deletion being considered? FT2 ( Talk | email) 20:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Look at the previous AFD. This article seems to cover a non-notable piece of software. I have cleaned up the Operation section, removing a reference to a comparision with True Image 7.0, which is now 4 versions old. There is nothing exceptional about ATI's ability to backup through any of those methods. I think the section on supported backup locations is un-necessary. Or BESR if you take the Universal Restore into account. It is more like Backup Exec if you want to choose a Symantec product to compare it to. I think the introduction regarding its similarity to Norton Ghost is a bit off. This whole article is fairly badly written.
![installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008 installing and using acronis home on windows server 2008](https://crack4windows.com/thumbnail?path=%2Fcontent%2Fimages%2Fscreens%2Facronis-backup-and-recovery-advanced-server-sbs-edition_1.png)
I have also changed the wording in the Universal Restore section regarding how UR works. It is Acronis True Image 9.1 Server for Windows, not Acronis True Image Server for Windows 9.1. I have changed the nonclementure (?) used in the bottom section. It is not compatable with Server for Linux, so I placed it within the brackets instead. The sentence states Acronis Enterprise versions, so the Home exception is implied. It replaced True Image Home with Server for Linux in the section regarding Universal Restore. Instead the article should be labeled as unbalanced. While this page does look like a commercial, that doesn't mean that the article should be scrapped. Also obtained a list of filesystems instead of saying "Arconis supports most filesystems". Billyoneal 02:56, (UTC)Įdited page to make less biased. Does every product on the market get its own Wikipedia page?